jump to navigation

Our SID, Their SID, Your SID January 21, 2010

Posted by aastrong in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

Hope everyone had a wonderful Holiday season. Back with a brief blog about instrument flying. When you begin, or are involved in instrument flying on a regular basis, you’re are bound to come across an airport that has a Standard Instrument Departure, SID, or now refereed to as a Departure Procedure. SID’s or DP’s are published to expedite clearance delivery and to facilitate transition between take off and enroute operations and provide a standard route from the terminal structure to the enroute structure. They also offer a nice graphic and pictorial view of your flight path. Why do I mention this, because it’s a great tool to enhance your SA (situational awareness). And we all know you can’t have too much of that. Here’s a site with a decent overview, flight sim aviation zone.

If you find yourself flying SID’s or DP’s, be sure to read up on how to properly fly a SID. There are different kinds and they are flown differently. Your best bet is to go to this page of the AIM for complete info. My intention here is to offer a brief explanation of the effect of altitude clearances. If you are cleared a SID, it most likely will have route and altitude restrictions. Altitude restrictions can be to reach, hold, or exceed an altitude by a certain point or place on the route, or they can be a minimum climb gradient. For example, “aircraft must be able to maintain 1200 fpm climb” to a certain point or place on the SID. Remember this, altitude restrictions and climb gradients are not randomly placed on SID’s or DP’s. They are there for a reason. Whether or not you can figure out why they are there from reviewing the page doesn’t matter. You must plan to comply with the altitude restrictions.

Now, what if you are vectored off the SID or DP once established. What happens to the altitude restrictions. The following is an excerpt from AIM and provides the answer. “After an aircraft is established on an SID and subsequently vectored or cleared off of the SID or SID transition, pilots must consider the SID canceled, unless the controller adds “expect to resume SID.” This quote is a hot link to the AIM. Again, I suggest you go to the AIM and become familiar with SID’s and DP’s before flying them.

Then, after you are all up to speed on SID’s and DP’s here in the U.S., read up about them for flying in foreign countries. The flying rules in most places outside the U.S. are called ICAO and are made up of procedures derived from rules for building approaches, departures and arrivals called Pans Ops and or JAR OPS. These are different from the same rules used in the U.S. called TERPS.

That’s all for now, and its plenty. More on SIDS next time.

Code Share, Load Share, My Share November 23, 2009

Posted by aastrong in Uncategorized.
add a comment

Just got back from London last night. The trip went well with no surprises. Unfortunately for the Brits, the weather in the U.K. was terrible. I believe I heard 13 inches of rain in one day, in the lake region.

The captain I was flying with was in fact a British trained military pilot. He therefore was more friendly with our ground operations people at Heathrow which lead to some interesting discussion about the American Airlines, British Airways, Iberia merger that has been in the news lately. My thinking was AA would drastically reduce our trans Atlantic flying if a merger were to happen. It all has to do with unit cost. Who ever has the lowest labor unit cost will most likely do the flying. If this were to come true, it would directly impact my job. It would mean less seniority at the least and being displaced to smaller equipment that pays less at worst. The captain agreed with my assessment, then added some perspective.

I would most likely still have a job. The ground operations personnel working at Heathrow would probably not fair so well. You see, British Airways has a major operation at Heathrow with plenty of people already doing the same type of work our ground ops people do. Add to that the duplication of office space and other types of employees, mechanics for example, and suddenly I didn’t feel so badly. The fact of the matter is when American Airlines gets involved with an acquisition or merger, they don’t do a good job of looking out for their employees. In fact, I would venture to say they don’t care. If they want the deal, they do what ever they need to get the deal at the expense of any AA employee, except for themselves. Read that to say senior management. They get their share.

The bottom line is, somebody loses when there is a deal of this size. I hope those of you involved anything like this with a large company make out better. I haven’t been so lucky with any such deal during my tenure at AA. When you are in this profession, you are a unit cost. When a code share, load share or any other name they want to call it happens, some employee loses their share. Beware! In the airline business, management is very generous with your share.

If you insist on pursing an airline job, make sure you have an education for a plan “B” to either replace or supplement your income. I’ve been supplementing my share with several business ventures over the years. Lately it’s been with a little project called STOR’EM. Check it out. I’ll be back before my favorite holiday, Christmas.

Aviation Earning Potential….or NOT October 14, 2009

Posted by aastrong in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , ,
add a comment

I know, I know, I’ve been away for a while, again. For good reason though. I’ll get to the reason in a moment. What I want to talk about in this blog is aviation earning potential. I like to say “it WAS a great career”, then it became “a great JOB”, now “it’s JUST A JOB”. WHY!! Because the earning potential of a professional airline pilot has been eroded significantly over the past decade. Airline management has taken every economic hick-up and turned it into an opportunity to extract wages and benefits from the employee groups. Additionally, regional carriers have grown exponentially while mainline carriers have contracted. Regional carriers don’t pay very well and the resulting contraction of mainline carriers has limited opportunities for better paying professional airline pilot careers. If any of that is incorrect, or, if anyone has seen or heard good news coming from the airline industry contradicting what I just said, please let me know. The bottom line is career airline pilots bottom line earning potential has been very negatively impacted.

What to do. Well, work more to sustain you life style at your current job, find something ADDITIONAL to do, or change your lifestyle to something less. I see and hear the first two options being done on a regular basis, not so much the third. I’m involved in the second option, something additional. I’ve formed a product development company called Aloft Enterprises. What we do is design and manufacturer inexpensive products for jobs people want done. Our first product is currently being launched on the internet primarily and in some local retail stores where I live. It’s called STOR’EM. See all the details at STOR’EM. STOR’EM is a winding and storage device for light weight household items. It provides you with a portable winding, dispensing and storage device for things like extension cords, rope, chain, and, in its TARGET product launch form, specifically to a WIND AND STORE CHRISTMAS LIGHTS. It is a stupid simple idea but does not exist. It will eliminate the mess, simplify the task and improve storage for your Christmas lights and more. It will help you get and stay ORGANIZED.

How will this turn out? I have no idea! Will it supplement my airline career earning potential? I don’t know. But, it is something I like doing. That is how you should approach your additional activity. Do something you like doing. If it pays off great, if not, you’re doing something you like.

So, please check out the website and let me know what you think.

Be Worth It August 4, 2009

Posted by aastrong in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , ,
add a comment

Back again for a short blog.

In reference to the latest airline accidents, there has been  a lot of discussion on pilot training. For example, what is mandated training, what is minimum training and train to standards. Some light has been shed on what carriers provide training over and above the approved standards dictated by the FAA. I would like to comment briefly on how those questions apply your career as a pilot.

The bottom line here is, and I know this sounds like a cliche or “the party line, but “it is your training”. Most, if not all aviation departments have a training feedback method. If you are not satisfied with your training, write a lucid letter to the person charged with handling the feedback, and explain in good detail what you disliked, why you disliked and, if your experience warrants it, make suggestions on how to make those items better. Don’t send a letter that is just a bunch of complaining without examples and suggestions. It will come across like whinning. Also, keep it to training issues. In other words, the content of the material, the manner in which it was presented, the instructor and perhaps the facilities. Don’t make it personal, make it professional.

While you are in training, make the most of it. Take the opportunity to ask questions, ask for another ILS or another single engine approach, ask for techniques and experiences of the people around you and most importantly, focus on while you are there. Finish all the bitching about having to go to training on the trip there so when you get there you can “get in the zone”.

I’m sure some of you who’ve read my previous blogs see the above as a departure from my not so corporate friendly disposition. Why the change? Because my rear end is at the front of the bullet and I want to get home to my family at the end of every trip. And I don’t know about about the rest of  you, but I don’t do a lot of studying on my own time. So, when I get there, I like to get “boned up” on the systems and hot topics. And I must say the training facilities and instructors at AA, if not best industry wide, have to be TOP 3.

Why all this about training. Two reasons. First,  you should know your job. In our case as professional pilots, that means in large part your airplane, along with policies, procedures, rules and regulations. For this blog, the emphasis is on the airplane part. As professional pilots, we should always be striving to learn more about the equipment we operate to the point where nothing the airplane is capable of surprises you, ever! Thing about that a bit. Second, there was a time when a major airline captain’s salary would allow him to “buy a corvet a month”. Airline management views us as an expense. Nothing more, maybe less. They will continue their assault on our profession. It is our responsibility to stop the assault and return the airline pilot profession to the compensation it deserves. As we work toward that goal, it is also our responsibility to as prepared for our work as possible. So take advantage of what ever training you’re involved and be prepared. Remember this, I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, we can lose our lives and or our licenses every day we go to work. Not many professions can say that, and we should be compensated accordingly. But, we have to prove we are worth it every flight operate.

Back soon with some new stuff and a new project.

Aloft or Afloat March 24, 2009

Posted by aastrong in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , ,
1 comment so far

Hello, been away for a while working on another project. I’ll share a little about that soon. For now, lets talk about the job of a professional aviator. 

Broken down simply, your job as a professional aviator is to move an airplane from point A to point B safely and efficiently. It starts to get complicated when you add in all the other factors. For example, what kind of plane are you moving, what kind of cargo are you moving, what type of flying are you doing – night, over-water, long haul, short haul etc. We’ll keep it simple here by limiting this discussion to moving an airplane safely.

I’m sure you’ve all read, seen or heard about the airplane that successfully ditched in the Hudson River.  I waited a little while to add my opinion and think it’s appropriate with the discussion of moving an airplane safely. There has been a lot of talk about the pilots being hero’s, the event being a miracle etc., etc. In fact, you’ve probably heard or seen the pilots attempting to not call themselves hero’s. For the record, I think they were hero’s. The pilots and the entire crew. Here’s why. To move an airplane safely can encompass a lot of different actions for a single flight, and, different from flight to flight. I use the expression “a walk in the park” for a day when every thing went right. “Once crisis after another” I use describe a bad day. In either case, the many actions required to move an airplane safely require the crew to constantly make decisions. Because of the 3 dimensional world aviators operate in, and I frequently tell young pilots if they’re not paying attention the third dimension will kill you, those decisions have to made rather quickly in many cases. You’re attention to detail during training will help a great deal with this process. This crew apparently paid attention. Although the airplane didn’t make it back safely, everyone did. 

Here is what they were faced with; they had approximately 3 minutes to – figure out what happened – determine what the options or courses of action were – choose the best one – and execute. As I’m sure you know, the happy ending says it all. Mission accomplished.

Are you prepared to operate your airplane safely every time you fly? Are you prepared to react quickly if needed? Can you make the difficult choice? That is the profession you are in. Constantly training, asking questions, reviewing manuals and paying attention to every flight is necessary to be a good aviator. Remember, that third dimension will kill if you are not paying attention. What an airplane does should never surprise you. (more on that in a later blog). 

When you come up for a raise or new job, remember the third dimension and it’s potential. Stand firm on your commitment to be a professional aviator who can move an airplane safely, but also stand firm on what a professional aviator should be paid. Don’t settle for a wage that may make you think about settling in an airplane. It may make the difference for whether you career stays aloft or afloat.

What’s Your Type January 8, 2009

Posted by aastrong in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , ,
add a comment

Well, 2009 has begun. I hope everyone had a prosperous 2008 in some manner despite all the gloom and doom Wall Street produced. Even more so, I hope you all have a very good 2009. With that in mind, I’ll attempt to discuss type ratings and tie it in to the last blog, Fly home for the holidays, where I spoke briefly about compensation.

Most major airlines pay pilots an hourly wage. I know it seems a bit strange, but that’s how it works. And, that hourly rate is dependent  upon 3 things; your longevity with the company, whether or not you are a captain or first officer, and how much the airplane weighs. Or, so we say, the more it weighs the more it pays. Pay scales for longevity usually max out at 10 or 12 years of service with the company. The other two parts of hourly pay rates are somewhat tied together. Normally, the more senior captains and first officers are flying the heaviest or largest airplanes. Why, because they pay the most. For corporate flying, I can’t say a lot about pay scales etc. But, I can say there is some correlation. You can expect to make less money in smaller corporate jets, in both seats, than you’ll make flying larger jets. Very simply, a Learjet Captain or First Officer will make less than a Gulfstream crew, who will make less than those flying something larger.

How does all this tie in with the last blog? I touched on compensation briefly in relation to our worth as professional pilots. How much we are worth, especially in corporate flying jobs, is strongly tied to what kind of aircraft “type ratings” we have. You need a type rating to act as a pilot in command. See FAR part 61 for definitions and requirements. The point is, the quantity and quality of type ratings on your license will have a great effect on what kind of job you can expect to get. By the way, just because you have a specific type rating doesn’t mean you’ll get hired as a Captain. Though not unionized for the most part, many corporate flight departments use date of hire, or some type of seniority, in conjunction with performance when determining who get the next Captain upgrade. See these two blogs for some insight to being a Captain, Learn to Fly – Civilian Path and The Informal Interview and You.

So as your career progresses, pay attention to what type rating options are available at each job you consider and how useful a particular type rating may be in the future. Keep your eyes and ears open for opportunities to earn new or better type rating. While you’re doing that, be aware of any potential restrictions that may be placed on your type rating. Ideally you want none. I can give you 2 examples of restrictions on my ATP(airline transport pilots license). They are B757/B767/B777 – circling approach – VMC only, and 777 limited to FAR 121-543 operations only. In effect, a restriction is a limitation on your license you most likely don’t want. I cannot shoot a circling approach for AA as a Captain in those airplanes unless the weather is VMC. Big deal, right! You never know. Also, the 777 restriction mean I cannot act as a Captain on the airplane except for cruise flight. There is a bit more to this one, but suffice it to say, the restriction limits future employment opportunities since I don’t have a full ATP in the 777. Try to avoid an restrictions being placed on your license. It could limit your worth as a professional pilot!!!!

A type rating does cost an employer money so don’t be pushy when attempting to get them added to your license. However, protect your worth and be tactful when asking or suggesting you be allowed to get a type rating. The flying business is unpredictable and you never know when a type rating will come in handy for the next job.

That’s all for now.

Fly Home for the Holidays December 30, 2008

Posted by aastrong in Uncategorized.
Tags: , ,
add a comment

Hello to all, Merry Christmas, Happy Holidays and all that stuff. I really mean all that stuff, too.  Take the time to enjoy the season and celebrate what ever it is you celebrate. 

If you have or are considering a flying job, flying home or being home for the holidays, any holiday that is, can be very challenging. I’ve recently received several emails from the APA, the union representing pilots at American Airlines, about the percentage of pilots who will NOT be home for the holiday(s). These emails, rightly so, included a comparison of how many management types would be home for the holidays. The numbers are  around 90 % of pilots working, while 90% of management is home. I include this brief side note for a reason. When it comes time for you to get a flying job and you consider that you are a professional, it took time and money to get to the point where you are qualified for a decent flying job, you could lose your license every time you go to work, you could not come home from work any given day among other things, don’t forget to consider time away from home on holidays and weekends when figuring what would be reasonable compensation for your profession. Sit down and understand what it is you do as a professional pilot and that not everyone can do it and what your career sacrifices will be. Don’t allow your profession to be minimized.  Unless you own your own flying business, your boss, manager or whatever will, no doubt, constantly try to pay you less for what you do. Go back to the statements above before deciding to accept less, and when presented the opportunity, remind them of the hazards you face daily.

And, if that’s not enough, check out the blog titled seniority, seriously.  This will help you understand how large the seniority issue looms in an aviation career. Big or small flight department doesn’t matter, seniority applies.

So, to wrap it all up, if you really want to be home for the holidays, every holiday, every year, don’t get a flying job. Get a different job and buy a ticket to fly home for the holidays. If you’re OK with missing a holiday or other family event on occasion, you’ll be OK with a flying job. 

Next week, or so, I’ll get back to some more civil aviation stories and some new topics for the new year ( and a happy one to all)

Other Aviation Programs September 15, 2008

Posted by aastrong in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , ,
add a comment

Back with a short blog on a couple opportunities to learn about an aviation career. I ran across these on my last trip and would like to share them with you. As I’ve promised in previous blogs, I will have a blog about commuter flying next, no kidding. For now, share what you are about to read with anyone and everyone you know who is interested in flying. Why? Because in today’s world you should take every opportunity to learn about future endeavors. There really is no excuse for going into to something new completely blind. Way to much information on just about any topic is easily available. So, in my opinion, there is no longer an ignorance excuse. Be responsible, do your research and share it with like minded people. You get the point.

 American Airlines has a company newspaper (company rag, as it’s referred to by most) to spread news about the industry, company programs, employee at-a-boys, and a lot of what they want us to believe. The latter part is referred to as “the company cool-aid”. Better explained as information they want you to hear and see to increase the chances you’ll believe what they say and act accordingly. Sometimes contained in the company rag are useful stories, good stories about people and activities. And American Airlines does sponsor some very, very good activities. They sponsor an award called the American Airlines Safety Award. It’s an award that is part of the National Intercollegiate Flying Association’s Safety and Flight Evaluation Conference- NIFA SAFECON-which is an annual event held for collegiate aviators. In fact, it’s billed as the Final Four or College World Series for collegiate aviators. Nearly 90 flight teams from across the country compete in regional meets for a chance at the national level competition. Only 30 teams make the national event. The American Airlines  Safety Award goes to the team that made the greatest contribution to aviation safety through their own program’s procedures and methods of promoting aviation safety. Basically, competitors earn points for each eventat the conference. The team with the most points is crowned National Champion. The current American Airlines Safety Award winner is the U.S. Air Force Academy. The current National Champion is Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Prescott Arizona Campus. The point here is two-fold; American Airlines has a number of worth whileprograms to promote aviation(probably more than most) but I’m sure they are not the only major airline who has them. So, if you are truly interested in becoming a pilot, do some research and look for activities like this to get involved in. You never know when something like this will turn into a future job. Have a quick look at the informal interview blog to see what I mean.

The other program I found in the company rag, better known as the Flagship News, is called ACE(Aviation Career Education) Academy tour. The tour was comprised of students who all have had some type of flight experience(translation-interested kids like yourselves if your reading this), simulator and or flying, and plan to have their pilot’s license when they turn 16. It included a tour of a 757 cockpit, hosted by an American Airlines Chief Pilot, a visit to the American Airlines Operations Tower, a tour of the Admirals Club(American Airlines VIP Club), a tour of the terminal along with several other aircraft. This was a school sponsored event supported by AA. Check our school for programs like this and if they don’t have one, here’s and idea, consider starting one. Imagine how being the originator of a successful program would look on a resume’?! Again, you never know what you may learn or who you may meet when you participate in an activity like this(see the informal interview).

I believe it is important to research your career field, at least a little, before you get involved. It is even more important when considering aviation as your career. The major airline jobs are, in brief, not what they used to be. Getting the training to become qualified for a major airlines is not what it used to be. However, there are some good flying jobs outside of the major airlines. Participating in programs like I mentioned above, and researching, may lead to a flying or aviation related job you never considered. So, keep your “heads-up” on your chosen learn to fly path. You never know where opportunity is hiding.

And yes, next blog will be commuter flying info. That’s all for now.

The Barter & Charter Experience August 26, 2008

Posted by aastrong in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , ,
add a comment

A recent trip revealed another learn to fly story, and “something else“. The Captain on my most recent trip echoed several other Captains who learned to fly on the civilian path. He was 16 years old, on vacation, when he got the flying bug. A ride in an open cockpit bi-plane was all it took. Upon returning from vacation, his long walk along the aviation career path began.  He traded labor for flying and instructing, and flew for a regional carrier before getting hired by a major airline. The “something else” was actually two fold and contained in the details of his path. Here they are.

  The labor for flying hours barter details just about blew me away. For the younger portion of the readers, I know it will blow you away. To begin, I have to offer a sort of standard disclaimer, which is, this story is not for people with weak stomachs, afraid of hard work or a self entitlement attitudes. So, here we go. The guy worked at his local airport in Groton Connecticut. Yes, he fueled airplanes, towed airplanes, swept, mopped and cleaned toilets for 10 and 1/2 hrs. In exchange for what you ask?! For one hour of flying time. That’s right! He worked 10 1/2 hours for 1 hour of flying time.  Freezing cold, stifling heat, Gail force winds, it didn’t matter. He worked when he was told. And by the way, when he worked was at the owners discretion.  So, 10 1/2 hours could have taken 1 day or two weeks to accumulate. Now, think about what I just said and how it would impact your schedule or life at that age. Then ask yourself if you would do it. A heavy metal flying job is something you really gotta want, no kidding. One part of the something else was that fact that a barter for flying opportunity existed. I don’t know for a fact, and I’m not a betting man, but I would bet on that opportunity no longer existing. The reason is because at or near minimum wage, you’d have to work nearly 20 hrs to cover the cost of one flying hour in today’s world.

Back to the story. He earns enough through barter to get a private license at 17 yrs old. Then, actually goes to work FOR PAY at the same airport while earning his commercial, instructor and CFI ratings. All together from the start it took him 3 yrs to become a flight instructor and actually get paid for flying. The next step was flying charter for 9 months, again at the same airport. With enough flying time under his belt, he moved up to a single pilot cargo job. Flying mail in a Beach 18, 6 nights a week to Canada was a prime stepping stone job at the time. He managed to last 2 yrs (not easy) and 2,000 hrs of flying time before the job went away. It happens often with small operators. Within 2 days of losing that job he was working for another company doing the same thing in Navajo’s and Baron’s. A year of that, plus 1 1/2 yrs at a commuter gave him enough flying time to start seeing a light at the end of the tunnel. And, it wasn’t a train. It was a job with American Airlines. He got hired with 7,800 hrs total time which wasn’t unusual for that era.

Now, if you revisit the progression of his jobs, and you’ve read any of the previous blogs, you’ve got to be thinking Informal Interview. Every job he got, before the commuter job, was due to an informal interview he didn’t know was happening. If you haven’t read either interview blogs, please do. There is good “stuff” in there.

  The second part of the “something else” is the fact that very little single engine charter flying remains today. What was once a great stepping stone job and an excellent training ground is becoming obsolete. Changes in operating costs, for example fuel, maintainence, and inspections, have risen dramatically. Add to that  the greatly increased cost of aircraft and the fairly recent chages to training requirements for charter operators, and it doesn’t take long to figure out why the small aircraft charter business is disappearing from the radar screen.

  To barter or not to barter? You may have to consider that for the civilian path. However, to charter or not to charter may soon not be a consideration as you plan your learn to fly path. Regardless of either of the above, remember this old attage, “Men plan and God laughs”. You’ll most likely find yourself in flying jobs you never considered and never in flying jobs you always considered.

Next blog-some commuter talk.

AIM & FAR Intro for Student Pilots July 8, 2008

Posted by aastrong in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , ,
add a comment

So far we have discussed a little about a lot. In keeping with that trend, here is a little about the Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR’s) and the Airman’s information Manual (AIM). For starters, you’ll most likely find them in a book store as a single book. That’s the way I’ve seen them in the past. At least that is the way a dinosaur like me got access. To bring us into today’s world, the website for the FAR’s is http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgFAR.nsf/MainFrame?OpenFrameSet . It’s a good website with a logical breakdown of the regulation contents. http://www.powells.com/biblio?show=TRADE%20PAPER:NEW:9780071479240:19.95 is a good website for the combination book. There is also an aeronautical information manual out there as well. http://www.faa.gov/atpubs/AIM/ is the shortcut for that.

So, that’s where you can find them. But, what’s in them? What do you need to know about them? Well, here is my attempt to explain. The FAR’s are a source for rules and regulations. For example, what is a part 121 operator, or more basically what is part 121? The FAR provides detailed definitions in legal terms. For more detailed explanations of operational regulations and how they pertain to you as a pilot, go to the AIM. For example, if you want to know what type of lighting is required for a specific type of approach, go to the AIM. It provides a detailed explanation and in many cases provides a picture. The same goes for holding instructions and entry parameters. You’ll read it in the FAR’s 10 times and may not really understand it. But, if you refer to the same topic in the AIM, you’ll probably have a picture to refer to and will most likely save yourself from reading the extra five times. As is said, “a picture is worth a thousand words”. And, as we say in the instrument flying world, “a peak is worth a thousand crosschecks”.

The first time you take an instrument ride, under the hood, you’ll understand what I mean. During my time at Air Force UPT, when you were sitting in the back seat of a T-38, under the hood on an instrument ride flying box patterns at 300 knots, a peak was priceless. I can’t say worth a thousand crosschecks because at 300 knots around a box pattern, you just didn’t have time for that many crosschecks. I might add that, although it has been a long time since I flew a T-38, I remember it like it was yesterday, and I lived it!! Helmet, oxygen mask, G-suit, skinny wing, the smell of JP-4 dumping into the after-burner, flying formation and all the stars you can imagine seeing on a dark night at FL390 and mach .95 like a dart in the sky, is all a permanently etched experience.  It was 6 months of 12 hrs a day, 6 days a week work, but boy I loved it and wouldn’t trade it for anything. In fact, I’d do it again in a second. Sorry, got carried away for a minute.

Back to FAR/AIM info. While you’re learning to fly (civilian path or military path), you should become familiar with both. What I mean by familiar is to know and understand the layout and content of each. Even more to the point, know where to find things within the books.  As you progress through your chosen “learn to fly” path, you’ll no doubt run across the “fire hose” treatment. The “fire hose” treatment is a learning philosophy that basically says throw more information at a student than they can handle. On average, the student will absorb enough to pass the course and the rest they’ll learn as they go. Guess what? The as they go part is the part where you learned the information is out there and where it is but you simply couldn’t remember it all. Now, the fire hose treatment is no fun while you’re experiencing it. You’ll feel stress and like there is no way you can learn it all. Remember, most of us can’t. Focus on the foot-stompers(emphasis items). If you hear something more than once, it’s a foot stomper. Also, understand this; in the aviation career field you simply can’t remember everything about your aircraft and or regulations. But, you do need to know the information exists and where to find it. Although you may not have retained or learned all the info, you most likely learned where to find it.

So, in summary, check out the FAR and AIM manuals. They are frequently sold in a combined format and are available on the web. Get familiar with the areas you’ll be working under. Understand the importance of knowing where to find “it”. Lastly, never fear the fire hose treatment. It’s just out there!

Next week, more on FAR’s and a bit about Captain.